Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Self Sufficiency in the City
Monday, July 27, 2009
Hard Times
The ongoing economic crisis has been tough for all but the few who have managed to somehow "cushion" themselves from the blow. Everyone from farmers to builders to developers to state workers and even college graduates are finding it hard to pay the bills. Every single person I know amongst friends/relatives are struggling more now than ever. Many are having to find 2nd and even third jobs just to get by and some are not getting by at all, are completely unable to even find work, and sinking ever deeper in this harsh economic sand trap. Are we ready for what may lie ahead? Do we have the nessesary community and systems in place to support us if and when things get worse?
Probably not.
While these frightening realities are sobering one cannot forget that even the simplest steps give us hope during "hard times". I'm not speaking about turning off the water while we brush our teeth. The truth is that we all try to make an effort to ease the hardship that another might face. Although we all know that life isn't all about aquiring "things", the reality is that some people are already past this and in deep financial trouble with no end in sight. Personally, if we know of anyone who have unfortunately lost their homes, we do what we can to support them and have even opened our home and had friends stay with us on a many occasions. (Didn't I say we had a knack for adopting folks?) A few people I know are still in this situation and are thankfully living with friends/family.
It can be hard to transition from lounging in a big air-conditioned home with no one to disturb us from our daydreaming but how many of us truly know what its like to live and work together? The Green Family Urban Farm project is about doing just that. We believe that through working together and doing so sustainably and earth friendly as possible is our only chance to survive if the "big one" ever hits. Its prudent to see this current crisis as a practice run and start making changes early while we can. Small steps can get one places and I've found that simple things like driving less and conserving water lead to more earth friendly habits. (In addition, it's high time we all made a more conciouse effort and stop watering our lawns!)
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Pictures
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Projects
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
National Animal Identification System
Financial costs
Financially, a system as vast as NAIS could be extremely costly.[13] Additionally, there is concern that the costs of complying with the program will drive small farmers out of business, due to the cost associated with registering each animal.[14]] Small farmers and families that sell off parts of their herds or flocks every year would have to register and pay a registration fee for every head of livestock or poultry, while corporate farms with large herds or flocks that move through the production chain as a group, will only have to pay the fee equivalent of owning one animal.[15]
In this scenario most of the costs of this expensive tracking system will fall on small farms and families, allowing corporate farms increased profits and lower costs. According to the USDA's NAIS User Guide (p27)[16], the cost of the various animal identification devices ranges from as little as $1 to as much as $20. For example, as indicated in that guide, an RFID ear tag costs from $2 to $3, while implantable transponders can cost up to $20, plus associated veterinarian costs. Consider the family chicken farmer, who will have to place a $1 visual tag on each chicken, while the corporate farmer will have to tag only one chicken in each flock, giving the corporate farmer a 1$ cost savings per chicken, over the family farmer. This disparity will further tip the scales in favor of corporate farms and give them greater ability to out-compete smaller farms, hastening the demise of the small family farm.
The costs of becoming NAIS compliant for a U.S. beef producer were found to be a minimum of $2.08 a head for large producers and as much as $17.56 a head for smaller operations, with an estimated average cost to cow/calf producers of $6.26 per animal, according to research by Christopher Raphael Crosby of Kansas State University's Department of Agricultural Economics published in 2008.[17] A spreadsheet developed by Kansas State University agricultural economist Kevin C. Dhuyvetter and beef specialist Dale Blasi to calculate the costs of a RFID-based animal identification system, published in July 2005, puts the costs at $7.21 per head for a herd of 250 cattle, based on variables including the cost of tags and hardware such as readers and computers.[18]
[edit]Civil rights concerns
There are also civil rights concerns, because NAIS establishes extensive government control over livestock, which are considered to be private property. There are also concerns that the big agribusiness companies will use this system to blame their mistakes in processing which introduces contamination to the food supply on small farmers putting them out of business. [19]
In Wisconsin, the first state to make NAIS mandatory by allowing Premises ID to become law in January 2006, there is the ability to allow for exemptions of small farms. However, this has been denied by the Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection (DATCP) in their rule making. Wisconsin State Statute 95.51 (3m)states that the department may promulgate exemptions based on size and type of farm, ATCP rule #17 makes Premises ID completely mandatory and offers no exemptions. Although DATCP Secretary Rod Nilsestuen says in a May 1, 2007 press release that Premises ID is not Animal ID, he does not deny that in September 2005 he wrote to the US House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture, Subcommittee on Livestock and Horticulture (serial number 109-16) that he and DATCP "support the use of RFID technology in all livestock species as deemed effective and appropriate by the NAIS Species Working Groups."
Other concerns in Wisconsin and other states (who contract with WLIC) is that the system is not maintained by state government, but instead relies upon the Wisconsin Livestock Identification Consortium (WLIC) to maintain the database of Premises ID registrants. This is currently continuing with the RFID tagging database as well.[20] The WLIC is a private interest group made up of Big Agribusiness, including Cargill, Genetics/Biotech Corporations, like ABS Global, and RFID tagging companies such as Digital Angel,[21] and many of these members parallel NIAA membership.[22] There are also in fact only 6 RFID tags that are approved by WLIC/NAIS at this time: 2 manufactured by Allflex, 2 by Digital Angel, one by Y-Tex and 1 by Global Animal Management. All four are WLIC members.[23]
[edit]Religious concerns
Finally, fears persist about plans to make NAIS mandatory on the federal level, which would threaten the religious freedom of those who believe that making a “mark” is sinful, such as the Amish. The Amish also object to the use of electronic devices such as microchips.[24] If microchip implants were required, as has been proposed in a 2004 report by the United States Animal Health Association’s Committee on Livestock Identification, it would also violate the rights of those who believe that this practice is morally wrong.
In fact, the Amish are actually suing the state of Michigan for being forced to use radio frequency identification (RFID) chips on cows, which violates scriptural warnings. Good for them. The last thing we need are more controls and regulations allowing "big brother" to make sure we are all living lives proscribed to us by someone else.
Hopefully, this policy doesn't make it past planning and we can go about our lives without the "help" of institutions such as this one. It is pure nonsense to think that by overspending and taking away individual and religious freedoms of people will lead to "convenience".
(All info courtesy of Wikipedia)
Once upon a time.
I was just going through some photos to add to my other posts and came across this pretty scene of the front garden from earlier (way earlier) this year. Even though we live just below the elevation for getting much snow, every once in a while we do get a freak snow day and this February was a great example of that. Since then, our front yard and hoop house has grown into a full sized garden complete with a forrest of this years tomatoes! I remember the days when there wasn't even a fenced area around the yard and all we could see from the window was a vast expanse of dry grass and dirt that people would bring the neighborhood dogs to poop on while poor honey was cooped in the backyard. Things have certainly come along since! (Although we still don't water the lawn) ;)
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Stepping back
We've also put in two more citrus (cocktail grapefruit and a meyer lemon tree) and the raised citrus orchard is almost filled in giving us a beautiful natural living screen along the back fence. That side of the yard is a bit lower than our neighbors so its nice to have the added sense of cozyness and gives a more interesting view. Many of these newly planted trees are already bearing a small crop and I can't wait to try them all!
Many other projects are in the works as nature is taking a break from the tripple digets. JC and I recently put together a set of new trellises for our vertical beds and they are making our vining crops MUCH more manageable. Now all I have to figure out is the right way to tie up our heavy hubbard squash and some pumpkins and melons so they don't fall off!
So today I am recovering from all the recent events. Things are looking amazing in the garden but it doesn't take long for me to look for new projects and things I/we want to improve. Sometimes its important to remember to stand back and just breath. We had planned on taking Honey (our dog) to the river for a swim but unfortunately she came down with an infection two days ago and we are keeping her home to heal and rest.
I desperately want to do some baking but the summer heat tells me it wouldn't be a good idea. I've been looking into building a cob oven for outdoor use. Some designs are supposed to heat to a temperature of 350 to 400 degrees fereinheight using only a few scraps of wood. This is definitely making me hungry thinking of all the goodies I would be able to bake without heating up the house. Time for lunch!